Kingdom of Heaven (Director's Cut)
2.5/4
Starring:
Orlando Bloom, Eva Green, Jeremy Irons, Liam Neeson, Marton Csokas
The version being reviewed is the Unrated Director's Cut. For the record, the theatrical cut is rated R for Strong Violence and Epic Warfare
As much as I would like to say good things about Ridley
Scott’s true vision of this Crusades story, I can’t. The problem lies not with Orlando Bloom (as
one might assume), but with the seriously confused script by “The Departed”
scribe William Monahan and the bungled handling of some of the intrigue that
goes on.
Balian (Bloom) is a blacksmith (not named William Turner)
whose wife has recently committed suicide.
Being of Catholic faith, this condemns her to an eternity in hell, so he
reluctantly agrees to go with the father he never knew he had (Neeson) to save
the soul of his wife and his own. But
when he gets to Jerusalem, he finds that the city is not so much threatened by
the Saracens (Muslims), but by the rift between the Templar Knights, who are
acting on the word of the Pope and want to destroy the Muslims, and King
Baldwin (an uncredited Edward Norton) and his supporters, who want to keep the
peace and allow people of all faiths to enjoy the Holy City.
Orlando Bloom is like Michael Cera; he can only play one
type of role, but when it fits, it works.
Eva Green is also good as Sybilla, Baldwin’s sister and later Balian’s
lover. Liam Neeson, David Thewlis and
Jeremy Irons provide able support. But
it is Edward Norton who steals the show.
As the leper king, Norton is both wise and fatalistic, and he tears at
the heartstrings as well. It’s an
especially amazing accomplishment since the mask he wears is really quite
creepy.
The main problem with the film is its protagonist. Until the end of the film, Balian really
doesn’t do anything. It seems he’s only in the film for the sole
purpose of watching him go from being a guilt-ridden blacksmith to the de facto
general of Jerusalem, something that happens entirely by coincidences. It’s not credible and it lacks the rooting
interest that the film needs to involve the viewer.
The intrigue that happens behind the scenes is both poorly
written and ineptly handled. It’s not
always clear who is related to who and what a certain character wants. There are also a few too many “words of
wisdom” thrown out there.
There are a few good things about this film. The cinematography is gorgeous and the
setting is effectively realized. And
although the bulk of the film is confused and uninvolving, the final battle
scene is superbly done.
I saw the Director’s Cut, but not the theatrical
version. I’ve heard that this one
fleshes out a major subplot that was left out by nervous studio executives who
wanted to keep the running time low. As
much as I respect seeing a director’s true vision, it still doesn’t help this
film.
Comments
Post a Comment