Hitman: Agent 47
2.5/4
Starring: Rupert Friend, Hannah Ware, Zachary Quinto, Thomas
Kretschmann, Ciaran Hinds
Rated R for Sequences of Strong Violence and Some Language
The history of video games turned into movies is not good;
at best, they’re cheesy fun like “Laura Croft: Tomb Raider,” but at worst, they’re
monstrosities like “Doom.” The original “Hitman”
movie wasn’t as bad as that, but the only things worth noting about it were the
performances by Timothy Olyphant and Olga Kurylenko. This new version reboot is nothing special,
but it’s at least entertaining.
Years ago, a scientist named Litvenko (Hinds) found away to
genetically enhance the human species to become super soldiers. Terrified of what he created, Litvenko
disappeared. Now, a young woman named
Katia (Ware) is searching for her father, but she’s staying on the run from
those who want to kill her, like a mysterious assassin (Friend). Her only ally is a man who calls himself John
Smith (Quinto), but can she trust him?
In addition to being rather trite and totally derivative,
the story doesn’t make a lot of sense.
From moment to moment it’s easy to follow since it really boils down to “shoot
the bad guys and protect the girl,” but the film doesn’t do a good job of
establishing who wants what. There’s
plenty of lying and double-crossing in the film’s first half, and the writing
is messy. Ultimately it’s all arbitrary,
but it can be frustrating to try and figure this all out. In an action movie, no less.
The acting is lacking.
As the title character, Rupert Friend (taking over from Paul Walker, who
was set to play the role before his tragic death) looks badass, but speaking
completely ruins the effect. Friend
tries to bridge the gap between remorseless killer and a man who recognizes his
own humanity, but the results are uneven; he lacks presence and intensity
(certainly nothing like what Hugo Weaving did in “The Matrix” movies). Michael C. Hall did this sort of thing a lot
better in “Dexter.” Hannah Ware is quite
good as Katia, the woman in search of her father. The film’s best scenes are when Agent 47 is
showing her how to use the skills she doesn’t know she possesses. Zachary Quinto makes for an adequate
antagonist, but like Friend, he lacks intensity and true malice. Thomas Kretschmann is limited to staying
behind the scenes and giving orders until the climax. And while it’s always nice to see Ciaran
Hinds on screen, his role is beneath him.
So you have a flat screenplay and uneven performances. What’s there to make this movie worth seeing
(or close to it)? Some nicely choreographed
action scenes. I’m not talking about
anything worth raving about (first time director Alexsandr Bach is no John
Woo), but they’re well-choreographed and crisply edited. They’re fun to watch, especially watching
each piece of 47’s careful planning fall into place. And it features the coolest gunplay since the
cult film “Equilibrium.”
I was going to give this movie a 3/4, but then I thought
again. Does this movie really offer
enough that it’s worth seeking out in a theater? I mean, does the theatrical experience have
anything that can’t be experienced on Blu Ray or Netflix? Not really.
This is a good “turn off your brain movie” for when you want to just sit
back on the couch with a beer or two and unwind.
Comments
Post a Comment