Lord of Illusions
2/4
Starring: Scott Bakula, Famke Janssen, Kevin J. O'Connor, Joel Swetow, Daniel von Bargen
The version being reviewed is unrated. For the record, the theatrical cut is rated R for Strong Violence and Gore, and for Language and Sexuality
Starring: Scott Bakula, Famke Janssen, Kevin J. O'Connor, Joel Swetow, Daniel von Bargen
The version being reviewed is unrated. For the record, the theatrical cut is rated R for Strong Violence and Gore, and for Language and Sexuality
I suppose that there is a dark side to everything. Movies that cause us joy were a nightmare to
make. Artists that we love are the
biggest jerks in real life. Religion
gives us hope and peace but at the same time gives birth to violent zealots who
think they can dictate the life and death of innocent people. In Clive Barker’s “Lord of Illusions,” magic
has the same duality. Illusion provides
entertainment, but real magic is a nightmare to behold. It’s an intriguing concept to be sure, but an
underwritten screenplay and a miscast lead turns it into a gory mess.
“Lord of Illusions” is based on a short story that Barker
wrote and features his famous character Harry D’Amour, played here by Scott
Bakula. These stories are a mix of
horror and film-noir, which was a point of contention for the studio, who
wanted a straight horror movie. It’s a
solid idea, but even after seeing Barker’s true vision, the film’s story doesn’t
make any sense.
Harry D’Amour (Bakula) is fresh off solving an exorcism case
when he’s called on to track down a slimy rat for insurance fraud. There, he finds a man who has been savagely
tortured and murdered. This puts him
into contact with Dorothea Swann (Janssen), the wife of famed illusionist,
Philip Swann (O’Connor). The murder has
put Philip on edge regarding a cult he was once a part of. He thinks that some of the other members are
trying to resurrect their leader, a nasty individual by the name of Nix (von
Bargen). Now it’s up to Harry to stop
them.
It’s not Shakespeare, but it could make a nice genre
flick. Unfortunately the screenplay is a
mess. Nothing makes much sense, primarily
because Barker never establishes a set of rules about what can and can’t
happen. As a result, the film never achieves credibility or coherence. Another run through the word processor could
only have helped things.
Scott Bakula is never credible as Harry. The role of a hard-drinkin’, cynical private
eye is an old one, played most famously by Humphrey Bogart during the Golden
Age of Hollywood. But Bakula lacks the
presence and the cynicism to pull it off.
He looks more like a doctor or a suburbanite than a private dick. Likewise, Kevin J. O’Connor is also miscast
as the magician. He’s too quirky and
wimpy. Famke Janssen is her usual
reliable self as the sort of femme fatale.
And Daniel von Bargen manages to chill as Nix.
What else can I say about this movie? It’s certainly not bad; it has some decent
shocks and suspense and contains a considerable amount of blood and gore (in
addition to the studio, the MPAA also demanded trims in order to secure an R
rating). But it could also have been a
lot better.
Comments
Post a Comment