The Many Saints of Newark
1/4
Starring: Alessandro Nivola, Michael Gandolfini, Leslie Odom Jr., Jon Bernthal, Vera Farmiga, Ray Liotta, Corey Stoll, Michela De Rossi
Rated R for Strong Violence, Pervasive Language, Sexual Content and Some Nudity
Full disclosure: I have not seen a single episode of "The Sopranos." I own the Blu Ray box set, but haven't gotten around to watching it. I'm wary of starting a new TV series because they are such a time commitment to see the whole story, and even if they are good, they eventually devolve into soap opera. Still, I intend to watch it at some point, but if "The Many Saints of Newark" is a point of reference, I might not bother.
The biggest problem is that the film has no plot. At least, one that isn't coherent. IMDb states that the film is: "A look at the formative years of New Jersey gangster Tony Soprano." The reason the pitch is so brief is because that's all I could get in term's of plot. Perhaps it's because the film's focus is divided between Tony (Gandolfini) and his uncle and father figure, Dickie Molisanti (Nivola). Truth be told, Tony doesn't have a lot to do other than cause trouble. Dickie gets the lion's share of the screen time. Unfortunately Dickie is both unlikable and boring. Alessandro Nivola is a fine actor, but he's tasked with the impossible: taking gangster and Joisey cliches that have become fodder for parody, and then taking them seriously.
Apart from Nivola, who still manages to impress from time to time despite the herculean hill he has to climb, the cast is littered with big names. Jon Bernthal, Leslie Odom Jr., Vera Farmiga and Ray Liotta. All do what they can, but I can only imagine that "The Sopranos" brand is the reason they signed on. No one has much to do, and they aren't bringing their A game either. Even Vera Farmiga, one of the most reliable and risk-taking actresses around, has moments where she goes over-the-top, but that may just be her character since the actress is virtually unrecognizable in the role of Tony's mother.
Defenders might say that I wouldn't get it because I haven't seen the show. Fair enough, but this is a prequel set years before the show. You'd think that would be a good point to jump in. Or maybe it gets bogged down trying to cram in every character from the show in some fashion (this is what aggravate me about the superhero frenzy that has a stranglehold on Hollywood). It's entirely possible to make a good prequel; I just replayed "Yakuza 0" after finishing the franchise and I was impressed at how well it worked. It concentrated on the story rather than the fan service, brining in old characters only when necessary.
But the film's problems are bigger than canon or having background knowledge. The film is far too long. Director Alan Taylor spends far too much time dithering with a subplot involving Dickie and his mistress (de Rossi) instead of focusing on the story of his feud with Harold McBrayer (Odom Jr), his former underling. That had potential to be interesting, although they would have had to at least try to connect it to Tony.
Perhaps I disliked this movie because I am not a fan. That's no excuse. A film's story and characters should always come before fan service and setting up preordained plot lines.
"I'm wary of starting a new TV series because they are such a time commitment to see the whole story, and even if they are good, they eventually devolve into soap opera."
ReplyDeleteThis is without a doubt, one of the most moronic lines I have ever read, and coming from your writing, that says a lot. You utterly fail to see the strengths televised media has compared to film, you insufferable twat. I beg you to write about something else. I'm not even saying give up on writing about film, but you need to write about other things because your film reviews are just terrible.