Narc
2.5/4
Starring: Jason Patric, Ray Liotta, Chi McBride, Alan Van
Sprang
Rated R for Strong Brutal Violence, Drug Content, and Pervasive Language
“Narc” is an uber-bleak cop movie about two cops who have
gone over to the dark side and are desperately trying to find their way to the
light. Suffice it to say, this is not a happy movie.
A decorated undercover cop named Michael Calvess (Van
Sprang) has been found murdered. With
few leads and no witnesses, the cops turn to a disgraced cop named Nick Tellis
(Patric) in a last-ditch effort to find the truth as quickly as possible to
avoid any bad press. They choose Tellis
because he too was an undercover narcotics officer. Tellis works with Calvess’s old partner,
Henry Oak (Liotta), who is also a decorated cop, but he has a hair-trigger
temper and there is evidence that he may not be particularly stable. But the deeper they get into the
investigation, the more likely that the task of escaping with their lives isn’t
the worst possible fate.
There are two things that really matter in this film: Jason
Patric and Ray Liotta. The whole film
revolves around them (Patric especially).
Sure there’s a plot, but this is as much a psychological thriller as it
is a cop movie. Liotta, is as always, a
force to be reckoned with. Although
primarily known for frothing at the mouth, Liotta is at his best when he’s
quiet and self-contained. Less
impressive is Jason Patric. Patric has
always been a low-key character actor (which begs the question who in the right
mind hired him to star in “Speed 2,” since his miscasting was the main reason that
movie was so reviled, but never mind).
When Patric is talking, he’s good, but a lot of the film depends on him
non-vocally expressing his fragile state of mind. Unfortunately, that is not something that
Patric excels at, and as a result, we don’t get as sucked into the story as
writer-director Joe Carnahan probably intends.
The second problem is that Carnahan gets a little too artsy
with his “CSI”-like flashbacks that he inserts into the film so quickly that
you might miss them. It ruins the
carefully built, brooding atmosphere that Carnahan wants, and they’re intrusive
as often as they are helpful. Worse,
they cause the film’s storyline to struggle to make sense.
To be sure, the film does a few things right. The most noticeable thing that one notices
about the movie is its atmosphere. As
lensed by Alex Nepomniaschy, this is a relentlessly grim movie. In a way, it’s almost good that the film
isn’t so involving because if it was, it would venture into “Once Were
Warriors” territory (not that that’s a bad thing, but still).
Lest I come across as too harsh on the film, I will say that
it is entirely watchable, and it does get going towards the end. The storyline is interesting, and I was never
particularly bored. Still, I can’t
really recommend it.
Comments
Post a Comment