Sherlock Holmes
2/4
Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, Mark
Strong, Eddie Marsan, Kelly Reilly
Rated PG-13 Intense Sequences of Violence and Action, Some Startling Images and a Scene of Suggestive Material
There’s no law against changing the details, or even the
genre of a story to suit a new vision.
It happens all the time.
Christopher Nolan’s Batman movies are much grimmer and set more firmly
in reality than the live action comic books of the first Caped Crusader
franchise. Michael Mann turned the 80s
crime show “Miami Vice” into a grim and stylized thriller starring Colin
Farrell and Jamie Foxx. Even Kenneth
Branagh turned “Love’s Labors Lost” into a Broadway-ish musical. So on the basis of switching genres, I can’t
criticize Guy Ritchie for turning the largely cerebral Sherlock Holmes into an
action hero of the 2000’s. What I can
criticize, however, is that the end result isn’t fun. The sequel did rectify this problem, to an
extent at least.
In the early 2000’s, Guy Ritchie was the British wunderkind
sent over from Britain. Known for his
unique takes on the British crime movies as displayed in “Lock, Stock and Two
Smoking Barrels” and “Snatch” (not to mention his marriage to Madonna), Ritchie
stayed under the radar after the disastrous reception of his film “Swept
Away.” Still, the thought of Guy Ritchie
doing a Sherlock Holmes movie sent fanboys into orgasmic glee, but the result
is surprisingly lackluster.
Holmes, as we learn, is a bad boy misfit who is not pleased
that his longtime partner Dr. Watson (Law) is moving out and getting married to
Mary Morstan (a criminally underused Reilly).
It’s as good of a time as ever, since they have just captured a ruthless
serial killer with magical powers named Lord Blackwood (Strong). Blackwood executed by hanging, but it isn’t
long before he has resurfaced, alive and well.
Now, it’s up to Holmes, Watson and a lovely thief, Irene Adler
(McAdams), to find Blackwood and stop him before he sets in motion a plan to rule the
world.
To its credit, Ritchie and his screenwriters remember that
Holmes isn’t Superman. The film focuses
on his puzzle solving through logic, and that is to the film’s benefit. There’s nothing more irritating than a
beloved character turned into a generic action hero simply because the studios
want to play to the lowest common denominator.
The performances are adequate, but nothing more. Downey is his usual reliable self, but quite
frankly, this is something he could do in his sleep. Still, Downey is one of those rare actors
who, even in the easiest role, is still fun to watch. Law ends his run of lazy performances,
although he’s given almost nothing to do; Watson is relegated to being a
sounding board and comic relief. McAdams
is cute, although that’s really all that’s required of her in this role (and she
has a nice nude scene from behind). Mark
Strong is wasted, however. An actor of
considerable talent and range, Strong was already showing signs of being
typecast in “Sherlock Holmes.” He’s
essentially playing the same bad character he would go on to play in “Kick
Ass,” although with less energy.
The problem is that Ritchie tries to force the character
into a comic book-like movie, something which he does not fit. With a less generic vision and CGI that
didn’t constantly call attention to itself, it might have worked, but the look
of the film reminded me of “Van Helsing,” which was a fun but very corny
B-movie. It’s a major comedown for the
much beloved character by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.
The film is also far too long. This is a story that could be told in about
90 minutes, but Ritchie stretches it out to over two hours. Part of the reason is that he uses so many
visual cues to retell what had just happened.
Admittedly, these are helpful, but some of the visual flourishes and
subplots are extraneous, and reek of a studio’s attempts to reach a foreign
audience (not to mention an excuse for Ritchie to show off).
To be honest, this wasn’t a particularly good start to a
franchise. Fortunately, it’s not really
necessary to see this one before you see the sequel.
Comments
Post a Comment