Copying Beethoven
2.5/4
Starring: Ed Harris, Diane Kruger, Matthew Goode, Joe
Anderson
Rated PG-13 for Some Sexual Elements
“It has promise. Let
me develop it with you.”—Beethoven, “Copying Beethoven.”
Too bad no one helped develop this film. It indeed has promise, although it doesn’t completely
come together. Due mostly to a
lackluster script, what could have been the second coming of the classic Mozart
biopic “Amadeus” ends up being a forgettable film with an amazing 15 minute
concert scene.
The film details the fractious relationship between Ludwig
von Beethoven (Harris) and his copyist, a conservatory student named Anna Holtz
(Kruger). Their relationship is
tumultuous; sometimes they work well together, other times they can’t stand
each other. But their work leads to one
of Beethoven’s many masterpieces: his ninth symphony.
The problem with the film lies not with the acting. Ed Harris is wonderful as the fiery
Beethoven. He gets everything right: the
ego, the deafness, the runaway creativity that all artists get from time to
time. Harris may lack the screen
presence to really pull this off, but he does an amazing job. As Anna, Diane Kruger shows once again why
she’s near the top of today’s up and coming actresses. There are times when Beethoven is rude or
downright cruel to her, and yet she still remembers that there is a
softer, more human side to him. The
actress manages to hit all the right notes despite being saddled with a
character that’s paper thin.
The film is directed by Polish filmmaker Agnieszka Holland,
and it’s about as well made as can be with this flat script. She adequately portrays the ups and downs of
the relationship between Beethoven and Anna, but there’s little that she,
Harris or Kruger can do with a script that’s just not very good.
The film does take off during the 15 minute rendition of the
Ninth Symphony premiere. It’s superbly
directed and filled with all the fiery emotion and soft humanity that makes up
the composer’s work (and for a sampling of the whole symphony, the segment is
arranged well enough that the transitions between the movements are seamless). The sequence occurs in the middle of the
film, but since this is a fictional piece and not constrained by reality, it
would have worked better as a conclusion to the film, with all the other
material leading up to it. I would be
tempted to give the film a tentative recommendation because of this sequence,
but ultimately I can’t.
Close, but no cigar.
Comments
Post a Comment