Grumpy Old Men
2/4
Starring: Jack Lemmon, Walter Matthau, Ann-Margret, Kevin
Pollack, Daryl Hannah, Burgess Meredith
Rated PG-13 for Some Sexual References
Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau were the ultimate odd couple
(ironic because they were good friends in real life). The comic chemistry between them was
electric, and when director Donald Petrie concentrates on that, the film is
hilarious. Unfortunately, the film is
more about the would-be tender romances that the Lemmon and Matthau have with
the flighty new neighbor. That would be
fine, if it were funny (which is isn’t) or if Ann-Margret had any chemistry
with either of her co-stars (she doesn’t).
Sadly that means a lot of boredom between the laughs.
John Gustafson (Lemmon) and Max Goldman (Matthau) have been
rivals for the last 50 years. Pranks and
name-calling are just two of the ways these two old codgers try to drive each
other nuts. But the private war going on
between them has taken an interesting turn when a beautiful new neighbor, the
flighty Ariel Truax (Margret) moves in across the street.
There are times when this movie is laugh-aloud funny. The scenes when John and Max are at each
others’ throats are hysterical. But there
just aren’t enough of these moments, and the romantic aspect of the film is
dead in the water. Even if the leads had
chemistry, it still wouldn’t work because 90 minutes is not enough time to
sufficiently develop two romances, even if they share a character.
I can’t blame the actors.
Lemmon and Matthau do what they can with the material they are given, but
their characters are paper thin.
Ann-Margret is too flighty to be believable. She may be a stunner to a pair of guys who
debate on how they want to die, but once we’re introduced to her, we can’t
understand why they are still interested in her. The two supporting actors, Hannah and
Pollack, have more chemistry than the three leads combined (at least
romantically).
Donald Petrie is not exactly a name director, and this is
why. His films are perfectly vanilla
with a few yuks along the way. They’re
typically not disasters, but there’s never anything special about them
either. But the decision to concentrate
on the romantic aspect is a disaster.
With better realized characters and a less superficial script, it might
have worked (the actors certainly have the talent to pull that sort of thing
off), but as it is, it’s a real blow.
Pity, because there are some solid laughs in this movie (including
the outtakes, which are, of course, hilarious).
Comments
Post a Comment