Hannibal
2/4
Starring: Anthony Hopkins, Julianne Moore, Gary Oldman, Ray
Liotta, Giancarlo Giannini
Rated R for Strong Gruesome Violence, Some Nudity and Language
When “The Silence of the Lambs” was unleashed in 1991, its
success surprised everyone. It was one
of three films to win the Oscar Grand Slam (Best Picture, Actor, Actress,
Director and Adapted Screenplay). The
film was so popular that novelist Thomas Harris was inspired to continue the
saga of Dr. Hannibal “The Cannibal” Lecter.
To say that the sequel is a letdown is the understatement of the
year. Jonathan Demme’s film was a
demented and frightening excursion into insanity. The sequel is a geek show that won’t raise
anyone’s pulse (although viewers may want a barf bag).
It’s been ten years since Lecter escaped custody, and while
he was hiding out in what appeared to be the Caribbean at the end of his last
adventure, he is now residing in Florence, Italy. Meanwhile, Clarice Starling is now a full-on
FBI agent, although a shootout has left her in disgrace (how this is her fault
is not made clear). But she is given
information on the whereabouts by a wealthy victim of Lecter’s, a disfigured
man named Mason Verger (an uncredited Gary Oldman). So she’s back on the case in a quest for
redemption, but she’s not the only one.
A fellow FBI agent named Paul Krendler (Liotta) and an Italian detective
named Pazzi (Giannini) want to catch him as well so they can collect a $3
million dollar reward.
With all of this talent, it’s a wonder how this could have
ended up misfiring so badly. We have
Anthony Hopkins returning, respected actress Julianne Moore taking over for
Jodie Foster, and Ridley Scott taking over for Jonathan Demme. Also on board are noted character actors Gary
Oldman (who is no stranger to playing psychos) and Ray Liotta (who like Oldman
is known for playing psychotics, but Krendler is not among them). But this film is a misfire. It’s certainly
not scary; in fact, it’s more often than not, boring.
Maybe it has to do with the script. According to iMDb, the script was rewritten
15 times, after Ted Talley’s (Silence’s original screenwriter) was
rejected. The Hannibal Lecter in
“Hannibal” is not the same one that terrified audiences in 2001. He has been stripped of all of his
intelligence, charisma and penchant for clever dialogue. In 1991, he was a unique and terrifying creature. Here, he’s a one-dimensional creep who just
looks like Lecter.
I feel bad for Julianne Moore. She’s a gifted actress, but she’s been
saddled with a role that was made definitive by Jodie Foster. Try as she might, she can’t make us stop
missing Foster. Giancarlo Giannini is
good as Pazzi, but it’s not a particularly meaty part. That’s more than can be said for Ray Liotta,
who is given almost nothing to do until the end (which is where it descends into self-parody).
I was also surprised by the lackluster direction from Ridley
Scott. Scott is no hack director. He’s made a number of brilliant films, such
as the 1979 horror classic “Alien.” Much
of the reason why that film was as scary as it was is because of Scott’s
ability to create atmosphere, but apparently after 21 years he’s lost his
touch. One might argue that a Hannibal Lecter
movie demands a different flavor than that of a slasher/monster movie, but
that’s really all this film is…except with a bigger budget.
Comments
Post a Comment