The Illusionist
3/4
Starring: Edward Norton, Paul Giamatti, Jessica Biel, Rufus
Sewell
Rated PG-13 for Some Sexuality and Violence
Magic in our world is typically a sleight-of-hand. The magician shows your something normal, but
through an act of deception that your eyes don't catch, he does something that
is normally impossible (I'll admit, Michael Caine explains this a lot better than
I can in "The Prestige," a movie that is quite similar to "The
Illusionist").
A filmmaker must do the same thing in a mystery: he must
show us something that we believe is real (when it really isn't), but when he
finally shows us all of his cards, we must be able to see that it all fits
together. In general, flawed movies of
usually succeed at the former, but fail at the latter, using a deus ex machina
to tie everything together. "The
Illusionist" is different in the sense that everything makes sense at the
end and in retrospect, but Burger's sleight-of-hand is sloppy throughout the
film. We know what Burger is showing us
cannot possibly be the whole truth.
Eisenheim (Edward Norton) is a popular magician in Vienna
around the turn of the century. He has
many fans, including the local police inspector, Uhl (Paul Giamatti). The only one who doesn't seem to like the
magician is the Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell). Leopold has it out for Eisenheim, even before
he realizes that his fiancée, Sophie (Jessica Biel) is in love with the
magician.
The acting is solid all around. Edward Norton, easily one of the best actors
of his age group, is terrific as the aloof and mysterious Eisenheim (although
he is slightly too emotive in his scenes with Biel, but I'm willing to
forgive). Paul Giamatti is great as
Uhl. He's torn between supporting the
man he admires, and the prince, who holds his future in his hands. The real shining star is Jessica Biel, who is
amazing as Sophie. The TV-star turned
Scream Queen has a nice chemistry with Norton, and is good enough to hold her
own against the likes of Rufus Sewell (one of my favorite under-recognized
actors).
The film's cinematography is also a high point. It's deeply atmospheric, and although there
are times when it gets too dark, those moments are few. Burger was trying to capture the feeling of
the world's first moving pictures, and he succeeds. The special effects are nifty and convincing,
which is of course crucial for a movie like this.
There are definitely some problems, however. Apart from the lackluster handling of the
mystery aspects, there are some holes that are not plugged by the end of the
story. And there is a subplot about
Leopold trying to overthrow his father that is mentioned once and dropped.
Comparisons to Christopher Nolan's "The Prestige"
are not unwarranted. Although
Christopher Nolan's film is better, this film is worth a look for those who are
interested.
Comments
Post a Comment